<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Strategic Planning Still Relevant?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.strategydriven.com/2010/07/28/is-strategic-planning-still-relevant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.strategydriven.com/2010/07/28/is-strategic-planning-still-relevant/</link>
	<description>effective executives, efficient employees</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:46:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Strategic Planning</title>
		<link>http://www.strategydriven.com/2010/07/28/is-strategic-planning-still-relevant/comment-page-1/#comment-7826</link>
		<dc:creator>Strategic Planning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategydriven.com/?p=6539#comment-7826</guid>
		<description>In today&#039;s highly competitive business environment, budget-oriented planning or forecast-based planning methods are insufficient for a large corporation to survive and prosper. The firm must engage in Strategic Planning &lt;/a&gt; that clearly defines objectives and assesses both the internal and external situation to formulate strategy, implement the strategy, evaluate the progress, and make adjustments as necessary to stay on track.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In today&#8217;s highly competitive business environment, budget-oriented planning or forecast-based planning methods are insufficient for a large corporation to survive and prosper. The firm must engage in Strategic Planning  that clearly defines objectives and assesses both the internal and external situation to formulate strategy, implement the strategy, evaluate the progress, and make adjustments as necessary to stay on track.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregg Gallagher</title>
		<link>http://www.strategydriven.com/2010/07/28/is-strategic-planning-still-relevant/comment-page-1/#comment-6823</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg Gallagher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 13:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategydriven.com/?p=6539#comment-6823</guid>
		<description>Ryan:

I don&#039;t think it so much having to ignore the core business &amp; associated competencies in order to enter new markets, as it is coming to understand the core, underlying purpose of the organization, and how that allows (perhaps impels) the company to serve this purpose and its markets better by extending into new products, services and markets.

Apple is doing so by coming to understand that it&#039;s purpose of changing how the work, thinks and plays (&quot;Think different&quot; is the most recent manifestation of this purpose into a &quot;motto&quot;) does not - and should not - constrict it to being only a computer company.

Think about what the true purpose of your firm is (beyond just making widgets)... and how that purpose might be fulfilled in new, broader ways in serving the marketplace...

Gregg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan:</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it so much having to ignore the core business &amp; associated competencies in order to enter new markets, as it is coming to understand the core, underlying purpose of the organization, and how that allows (perhaps impels) the company to serve this purpose and its markets better by extending into new products, services and markets.</p>
<p>Apple is doing so by coming to understand that it&#8217;s purpose of changing how the work, thinks and plays (&#8220;Think different&#8221; is the most recent manifestation of this purpose into a &#8220;motto&#8221;) does not &#8211; and should not &#8211; constrict it to being only a computer company.</p>
<p>Think about what the true purpose of your firm is (beyond just making widgets)&#8230; and how that purpose might be fulfilled in new, broader ways in serving the marketplace&#8230;</p>
<p>Gregg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norman Wolfe</title>
		<link>http://www.strategydriven.com/2010/07/28/is-strategic-planning-still-relevant/comment-page-1/#comment-6818</link>
		<dc:creator>Norman Wolfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 05:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategydriven.com/?p=6539#comment-6818</guid>
		<description>David,

First let me thank you for referring to my blog post on Fast company titled Strategic Planning is dead - Long Live Strategy Execution.  

Second I want to completely concur with your observations that strategy and the way it has beed used to refer to almost anything of importance has caused it to lose its meaning.   

And yes I agree that knowing what your company stands for is at the core of what strategy is intended to convey.  In fact if you read the follow on blog titled &quot;Strategic Planning is Dead - Setting a Sound Strategic Direction is Not&quot; you would see how I address the core underlying objectives of what strategy was intended to create.  You can read that blog at http://tinyurl.com/2de3bxv.

Thank you for the good work you do at breaking up management myths.  In today&#039;s world it is very needed

Norman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>First let me thank you for referring to my blog post on Fast company titled Strategic Planning is dead &#8211; Long Live Strategy Execution.  </p>
<p>Second I want to completely concur with your observations that strategy and the way it has beed used to refer to almost anything of importance has caused it to lose its meaning.   </p>
<p>And yes I agree that knowing what your company stands for is at the core of what strategy is intended to convey.  In fact if you read the follow on blog titled &#8220;Strategic Planning is Dead &#8211; Setting a Sound Strategic Direction is Not&#8221; you would see how I address the core underlying objectives of what strategy was intended to create.  You can read that blog at <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2de3bxv" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2de3bxv</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you for the good work you do at breaking up management myths.  In today&#8217;s world it is very needed</p>
<p>Norman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.strategydriven.com/2010/07/28/is-strategic-planning-still-relevant/comment-page-1/#comment-6687</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategydriven.com/?p=6539#comment-6687</guid>
		<description>I was always told to focus on the core business but I found a recent blog post that is telling me to do the opposite:

http://bit.ly/a3Za4G

Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was always told to focus on the core business but I found a recent blog post that is telling me to do the opposite:</p>
<p><a href="http://bit.ly/a3Za4G" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/a3Za4G</a></p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Is Strategic Planning Still Relevant? : StrategyDriven -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.strategydriven.com/2010/07/28/is-strategic-planning-still-relevant/comment-page-1/#comment-6646</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Is Strategic Planning Still Relevant? : StrategyDriven -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategydriven.com/?p=6539#comment-6646</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Skip Reardon, StrategyDriven. StrategyDriven said: New StrategyDriven article: Is Strategic Planning Still Relevant? http://bit.ly/bYmTgs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Skip Reardon, StrategyDriven. StrategyDriven said: New StrategyDriven article: Is Strategic Planning Still Relevant? <a href="http://bit.ly/bYmTgs" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bYmTgs</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/12 queries in 0.027 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 373/386 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.strategydriven.com @ 2012-02-08 14:06:37 -->
